Consti II case digest: IN RE: PETITION TO RE-ACQUIRE THE PRIVILEGE TO PRACTICE LAW IN THE PHILIPPINES, EPIFANIO B. MUNESES, Petitioner.

In Re Epifanio Muneses (Reacquisition of Philippine Citizenship) B.M. No. 2112

Keywords: ·         Petitioner Epifanio B. Muneses  became a lawyer in 1966 but acquired American citizenship in 1981 ·         Restored citizenship in 2006 by virtue of RA 9225 ·         A Filipino lawyer who re-acquires citizenship remains to be a member of the Philippine Bar but must apply for a license or permit to engage in law practice.

On June 8, 2009, petitioner Epifanio B. Muneses with the Office of the Bar Confidant (OBC) praying that he be granted the privilege to practice law in the Philippines.

Petitioner became a member of the IBP in 1966 but lost his privilege to practice law when he became a American citizen in 1981. In 2006, he re-acquired his Philippine citizenship pursuant to RA 9225 or the “Citizenship Retention and Re-Acquisition Act of 2003” by taking his oath of allegiance as a Filipino citizen before the Philippine Consulate in Washington, D.C. He intends to retire in the Philippines and if granted, to resume the practice of law.

The Court reiterates that Filipino citizenship is a requirement for admission to the bar and is, in fact, a continuing requirement for the practice of law. The loss thereof means termination of the petitioner’s membership in the bar; ipso jure the privilege to engage in the practice of law. Under R.A. No. 9225, natural-born citizens who have lost their Philippine citizenship by reason of their naturalization as citizens of a foreign country are deemed to have re-acquired their Philippine citizenship upon taking the oath of allegiance to the Republic. Thus, a Filipino lawyer who becomes a citizen of another country and later re-acquires his Philippine citizenship under R.A. No. 9225, remains to be a member of the Philippine Bar.  However, as stated in Dacanay, the right to resume the practice of law is not automatic. R.A. No. 9225 provides that a person who intends to practice his profession in the Philippines must apply with the proper authority for a license or permit to engage in such practice.

Thus, in pursuance to the qualifications laid down by the Court for the practice of law, the OBC required, and incompliance thereof, petitioner submitted the following:

1. Petition for Re-Acquisition of Philippine Citizenship;

2. Order (for Re-Acquisition of Philippine citizenship);

3. Oath of Allegiance to the Republic of the Philippines;

4. Certificate of Re-Acquisition/Retention of Philippine Citizenship issued by the Bureau of Immigration, in lieu of the IC;

5. Certification dated May 19, 2010 of the IBP-Surigao City

Chapter attesting to his good moral character as well as his updated payment of annual membership dues;

6. Professional Tax Receipt (PTR) for the year 2010;

7. Certificate of Compliance with the MCLE for the 2nd compliance period; and

8. Certification dated December 5, 2008 of Atty. Gloria Estenzo-Ramos, Coordinator, UC-MCLE Program,

University of Cebu, College of Law attesting to his compliance with the MCLE.

The OBC further required the petitioner to update his compliance, particularly with the MCLE. After all the requirements were satisfactorily complied with and finding that the petitioner has met all the qualifications, the OBC recommended that the petitioner be allowed to resume his practice of law.

WHEREFORE, the petition of Attorney Epifanio B. Muneses is hereby GRANTED, subject to the condition that he shall re-take the Lawyer's Oath on a date to be set by the Court and subject to the payment of appropriate fees.